Hunt vs optimization: which should I use?
A simple decision tree for choosing ARTEMIS Hunt flows versus DIONYSUS portfolio optimization in IRIS.
Choose optimization when…
- You want a full-book draft from the current analysis universe under explicit numeric risk caps.
- You are setting up or rebalancing a portfolio and prefer a solver-shaped answer you can edit line by line.
- You need optimizer diagnostics tied to constraint packs and presets.
Choose Hunt (or Cash Hunt) when…
- You want swap ideas or cash deployment suggestions with a different UX and scoring emphasis.
- You are exploring names opportunistically rather than solving the whole portfolio at once.
If both fire on the same night
Treat them as two opinions:
- Alignment → higher conviction that your risk settings match the cycle.
- Disagreement → slow down; check timestamps, signal filters, and whether Hunt used a narrower opportunity set.
One-line summary
Optimization rebuilds the pie; Hunt often suggests slices. Neither replaces your thesis and execution discipline.
Further reading
- How Hunt and Cash Hunt fit your process
- Hunt, Cash Hunt, and optimization
- Portfolio optimization with DIONYSUS
Educational disclaimer
TRINITY provides tools and education, not personalized investment advice. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions. See Disclosures.
Progress is saved in this browser. Cloud sync requires PUBLIC_IRIS_API_BASE, IRIS CORS allowlist,
and window.__trinityIdToken.